Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Fracking In Florida


                                                   Comments due March 3 , 2016

 With geology akin to a wet sponge and fragile underground aquifers that supply almost all its drinking water, Florida has never been considered part of the agitated battle over fracking as a technology for extracting oil and gas. But that began to change two years ago when a Texas­ based oil and gas company was found to have been using hydraulic fracturing, known as fracking, and matrix acidizing, a fracking­ like method that dissolves rocks with acid instead of fracturing them with pressurized liquid. Neither residents nor local governments knew about it because well stimulation, the catch­all term for both techniques, does not require a separate permit and is not regulated. The result has been an unlikely battle over fracking in Florida that is picking up steam across the state. The discovery outraged local government officials and environmentalists, who said they were worried about the effects of toxic chemicals and acids on Florida’s soil and water. Nearly 80 counties and cities have passed ordinances to ban or oppose the methods, in part because of their dissatisfaction with the State Legislature’s proposals. Now, a bill to try to regulate fracking is dividing the Legislature. Environmentalists and some local officials have sharply criticized the measure, saying that it would fail to regulate matrix acidizing, the technology most likely to be used in Florida, and that it would stop local governments from banning fracking. The bill also would revoke any local bans. The House has passed the bill, and the Senate is considering it. “There is a certain amount of despair and disbelief” over the legislation, said Penny Taylor, a commissioner in Collier County, which is home to Naples on the gulf coast. “At this point, the concern is spreading statewide, and it does appear that counties where there may not even be oil are very concerned about fracking.” Local officials said they were angry about being overruled by state lawmakers in Tallahassee, an increasingly common move by the Republican dominated Legislature when it is displeased with local decisions. “I think the last couple of years we have had some of the biggest assaults on home rule that we’ve ever seen,” said Marni Sawicki, the mayor of Cape Coral. Such strong local opposition has led to bipartisan misgivings in the State Senate, where a few prominent Republicans have broken ranks and publicly criticized fracking. “Fracking isn’t the way,” State Senator Anitere Flores of Miami, a conservative Republican who sits on the Appropriations Committee, posted on Twitter. The committee is the bill’s final hurdle to the Senate floor. Even the powerful chairman of that committee has had qualms about the bill. He recently delayed a hearing on the legislation, saying he wanted to learn more about the fracking technologies directly from officials at the state’s environmental protection agency. The hearing is expected to take place this week. “We want credible, scientific responses to questions, not special­ interest  responses,” State Senator Tom Lee, the chairman, said. In the House, lawmakers in support of the bill said local governments and environmentalists were misconstruing facts and exaggerating the potential consequences of the measure, which would regulate fracking for the first time. They said the bans were illegal because counties and cities have little authority to regulate oil and gas drilling, other than as zoning and land­use issues. Still, to allay their concerns, the authors of the measure said they tweaked it to, among other things, require oil companies to notify local governments when they intend to use fracking. Most of the state’s oil and gas drilling, which is modest compared with major oil ­producing states, takes place in Florida’s panhandle and in the southwest, on the edge of the western Everglades. “The environmentalists claim that we are taking control from local government on this matter,” said State Representative Ray Rodrigues, the Fort Myers Republican who introduced the House bill. “You can’t take something away if you don’t have it in the first place.” Mr. Rodrigues said the bill took other precautions as well. It calls for a moratorium on “high pressure stimulation” — hydraulic or acid fracking, but not matrix acidizing, which does not create cracks but helps enhance the process — until state environmental regulators complete a peer­ reviewed study. The study would look at how the extraction methods could affect Florida’s geology and its underground water supply. Regulators would then complete the rules and forward them to lawmakers for their approval. Dave R. Mica, the executive director of the Florida Petroleum Council, said acidization was not included in the bill because it was an offshoot of a common, well­ accepted technique used to clean wells and should not be subjected to more regulation. “It is regulated, and we have used it for decades and decades,” Mr. Mica said. Mr. Rodrigues agreed that a study was needed before moving forward because the state’s porous geology raises concerns that toxic chemicals could more easily penetrate groundwater. Studies from other states with different geology simply do not apply to Florida, experts said. Environmentalists are also concerned that the acids and chemicals used in matrix acidizing could further dissolve delicate limestone formations that protect the aquifers. “I think it would be foolish to ban a practice without any scientific evidence,” Mr. Rodrigues said. “For those who oppose the practice, they should support the study. And if the study proves their belief, then it’s acceptable to ban this practice.” But environmentalists and local officials said the legislation was seriously undermined by the fact that matrix acidizing was left out of the study and the regulations, leaving it to continue unabated. They want lawmakers to include acidizing in the bill but carve out an exception for the form used to clean wells. “We feel that we couldn’t have a bill that would address a technique we likely won’t use in our state and not address a technique we likely will use,” said Jennifer Hecker, a policy director for the Conservancy of Southwest Florida, an environmental group. Anthony R. Ingraffea, an authority on fracking at Cornell University, said that because the bill did not include rules for all forms of well stimulation, it would do little to help Floridians. He said the legislation appeared to be a “smoke screen” to eliminate local control of fracking. Mr. Mica, of the petroleum council, said environmentalists were trying to put up barriers to any well­ stimulation technologies and would prefer to let local governments ban them. “Environmentalists should just say, ‘We don’t want oil and gas,’ ” he said. (NYT 2/24/2016)

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

What I'm wondering is, what shale rock(s) does Florida have to offer? We all know that Florida is essentially just made up of wetlands. It's also home to alligators, crocodiles, crazy (and venomous) pet-turned-wild snakes, and hurricanes. With that being said, Florida doesn't exactly seem like the #1 pick for 'Best Stare to Frack in.' The gators, the crocs, and the snakes both could and would cause hazardous and/or what would be seen as unsafe working conditions, and the aftermath of hurricanes could not only cause hazardous and unsafe working conditions as well, but if things do end up going through and people do end up fracking there, the Hurricanes could damage the equipment, causing delays and God knows what else. As you can tell, I think fracking, especially in Florida, is a bad idea.

-Elizabeth Piper Phillips

Anonymous said...

I think fracking in Florida is a terrible idea. The state's geology is fragile enough as it is and most parts of the state are barely above sea level. On top of this, Florida also has a wet, humid climate and plenty of hurricanes and tropical storms. This doesn't seem like the best place to set up a fracking industry. While fracking and natural gas right now might seem like the best solution in terms of the most efficient, low-carbon, most "renewable" form of energy until we can implement renewable resources such as wind on a broader scale, there certainly must be better places to frack rather than Florida.

-Marrina Gallant

Ava Kratzinger said...

The other states suffering the damage done by hydraulic fracturing should be taken into more consideration by Florida state legislature as they assess the costs of the damage and retaliation by those citizens. Fracking will negatively affect the soil and water, and local governments and environmentalists have every right to demand a ban on fracking in their area and their state overall. With such a high risk method a study is unnecessary if they look at how other states have handled fracking in their respective states, which has not been a good track record for fracking methods. The protected everglades of Florida will be impacted by this oil drilling method and the damages will be catastrophic, to what end is unknown. Fracking in Florida will always be a very terrible idea and should not even be considered today. The only hope left is that the study done will show all of the negative outcomes that will greatly outweigh the economic gain.

Unknown said...

http://www.napavalley.edu/Library/Pages/HSI-STEM-2015-Summer-Institute---Fracking-Resources.aspx

Heres an infographic explaining Fracking.

Robot Emperor said...

There's been a lot of controversy around the Texas fracking, from what I've been reading, and that sort of makes it difficult to form an opinion. The fact that some of the studies conducted on the effects of fracking in a particular town seems to have been taken down really somewhat bothers me.

I think the first thing that needs to happen is a more clear discussion by people easy to search and reputable, and an explanation by both sides on what the damage will be in each context (from what I've read, also, this varies due to different thicknesses of bedrock, etc.).

Anonymous said...

Ann Marie Pavia

This form of fracking is controversial because there is not enough research that has been done on it. In the article it states that matrix acidizing was not included in the studies done by those who are attempting to pass the bill. Environmentalist are concerned that it will ruin limestone formations that protect the aquifers. This could in turn, impact the wetlands in Florida. Florida is known for its unique body of waters and animal life. It makes sense that the bill is being pushed backed even by some Republican heads in the area. Those who are for this form of fracking argue that they are not using more conventional methods of fracking and therefore should be allowed, however, it should not be so because the consequences could be worst since it is a fairly new form of fracking.

Rashed Al Romaithi said...

Currently there are two sides presented in United States, the ones that successfully mined and processed shale gas, and states that prevent the development of shale gas. This division, in fact, reflects the traditional wisdom of the political division of the country. While Texas shale gas “Barnett” was one of the most actively developed in North America, the field “Marcellus,” located in the state of New York, is practically inaccessible for development. Anyway, the technology is still developing. And more environmentally friendly methods of production of shale gas will eventually be created. The strongest argument in favor of shale gas is the inexorable growth in world energy demand and decreasing stocks of “ordinary” natural resources in most regions, traditionally rich in oil and gas. While China and India are competing in the struggle for global resources, such countries as the United States, need to develop unconventional resources if they want to maintain the quality of life of the population at the same level.

Joseph Santini said...

Fracking, or the process of injecting liquid at high pressure into subterranean rocks, boreholes, etc., so as to force open existing fissures and extract oil or gas, has serious environmental implications. Specifically, the idea of fracking in Florida is risky because of Florida's geology "akin to a wet sponge and fragile underground aquifers that supply almost all its drinking water". For this reason, Florida was never considered a potential fracking destination, but has been an issue as of recently. Matrix acidizing, a form of fracking involving the decomposition of rocks and soil, using acid. Now, a bill is attempting to be passed that "regulates" fracking. A lot of environmentalists are totally opposed to this idea because they think that it will act as a smokescreen for big businesses to continue fracking, and continuing to destroy the environment. If we found a way to reduce the use of fossil fuels in general, and come up with sustainable energy alternatives, we would not have to use oil/gas extraction methods such as fracking in the first place.

Unknown said...

The ban or regulation for fracking in Florida trying to be passed is a very controversial topic. I recently watched a movie called Promised Land staring Matt Damon which really opened my eyes to fracking. It was about a big oil company trying to come into a small town and buy them out so they could frack. In my eyes it was just a giant company trying to take advantage of small town people with little money. There is still not enough information on the effects of fracking and how it damages the environment. The big Texas oil company moving into Florida to frack on the everglades is extremely shady from my point of view. Without telling local governments and environmentalists that anything was going on proves they are trying to hid something.These local governments and environmentalists want bans and regulations on fracking because it could very well be destroying the environments and aquifers we might need one day. I believe they should pass regulations or maybe even bans on fracking because in my eyes it is another depiction of American Greed. Florida has poor land to start, so why would they be injecting it with chemicals and acids to affect it. There are millions of solutions for alternative energy in today's world, so why are we going to damage the very land we live on.